Bjorn Borud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > for Emacs it would be far more helpful if the Lisp-implementation was > replaced with one that is more efficient and Common Lisp-like. > (indeed several friends of mine would like to see Emacs done in Common > Lisp, and I seem to have some memory of such a project existing > somewhere).
Agreed. Stallman got sidetracked by Scheme, which IMHO was a dead-end. A Common Lisp emacs would be pretty sweet. There's a Climacs project, but they're just focused on providing an editor, not on providing a full-fledged emacs. -- Robert Uhl <http://public.xdi.org/=ruhl> Cinder blocks: $100 Mortar: $30 A cask of amontillado: $300 The faint screams of a desperate PHB: priceless. --O. Schwarz -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
