walterbyrd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Python seems to have a log of ways to do collections of arbitrary > objects: lists, tuples, dictionaries. But what if I want a > collection of non-arbitrary objects? A list of records, or something > like that?
Then collect them in a non-arbitrary way. That's a flippant response, but I don't understand the question. What are you asking for that you don't already have? A list can contain a sequence of objects of the same type already. What are you expecting that a list does not provide? -- \ "Faith may be defined briefly as an illogical belief in the | `\ occurrence of the improbable." -- Henry L. Mencken | _o__) | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
