Steve Howell wrote: > I suggested earlier that maybe we post multiple > solutions. That makes me a little nervous, to the > extent that it shows that the Python community has a > hard time coming to consensus on tools sometimes.
We agree that BeautifulSoup is the best for parsing HTML. :) > This is not a completely unfair knock on Python, > although I think the reason multiple solutions tend to > emerge for this type of thing is precisely due to the > simplicity and power of the language itself. > > So I don't know. What about trying to agree on an XML > parsing example instead? > > Thoughts? I vote for example with ElementTree (without xpath) with a mention of using ElementSoup for invalid HTML. -- Regards, Rob -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
