thx On Jun 1, 6:50 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ai wrote: > > Yes, you are right. > > But from this problem, could I infer that the statement "del xxx" > > doesn't release the memory which xxx used? > > It just removes the name xxx from the current scope - which will result in a > reference counter decrease. If that was the last reference, the object will > be destroyed. Most times. There are some special cases involving the usage > of __del__-methods on objects. > > Diez
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
