In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Erik Max Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Donn Cave wrote: > > > Not that it is of no historical interest to review all these > > reasonable arguments, but allow me to restore the context quote > > from my follow-up: > > If the counterpoints are of no historical interest, then the original > point must be of no historical interest either, since it was not widely > granted as true. "Not that it is of no historical interest" may have been too hard to follow, my apologies. I should have said "It may be of historical interest ...". After that, you lost me, but I guess I'm not going to worry about it. Donn Cave, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
