Interesting. You forgot to mention the Zionists. And therefore your post has been discounted as Zionist disinformation.
On 9 maio, 21:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The ODIOUS WASPs of FBI (FEDERAL BUREAU OF INCOMPETENCE) can ONLY S-T- > I-N-G. > > WASPS ONLY STING > WASPS ONLY STING > > The fact is that the ANTHRAX mailer was a WASP BASTARD being covered > up by the YANK Bastards at FBI. Mueller is DAMN Incompetent and > Coward. Bush's Crimes against the Nation tower far higher than those > of NIXON. Long time ago, when FBI had a competent and PATRIOTIC chief, > he was able to get the NIXON BASTARD out of the office and exiled to > China. > > If I found out some five FOOLISH PATSIES, Immigrants under mental or > social imbalance were planning a STUPID and IDIOTIC operation, I would > confront them with courtesy. I would tell them that this is a foolish > act. That I, a white FBI officer am doing them a favor out of the > goodness of my heart to not do such a foolish thing and give the YANK > SOBs an excuse for genocide and stealing their oil wealth by PERPETUAL > WAR of FAKE and SYNTHETIC TERROR. > > Thats how a good school master would confront a few stupid kids and > that is the way to solve this problem. > > On the other hand, a HEINOUS and RACIST crime was committed in 911 > CONTROLLED DEMOLITION as well as mailing those FAKE "Allah" letters > with GENUINE ANTHRAX through out the country by a yank motherfucker > related to the NATIONAL LABS and the ANGLO-SAXON-ZIONIST > ESTABLISHMENT. > > On May 9, 4:32 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Can anyone upload these seminal papers on the internet? Send them to > > City police chiefs, City officials, Mayors, Congressmen, District > > Judges, Federal Judges, Supreme court judges, FBI Incompetentos, CIA > > Bastards, Opus Dei, The Pope, Hollywood, President Vladimir Putin, > > Hugo Chavez, Dr. Fidel Castro Ruz, and of course the odius SMIRK and > > his VICE. Also dont forget to forward a copy to Wolfowitz and Shaha > > Riza (his highly paid persian prostitute). Send one copy also to the > > Madame who has caught the Washington officials by their balls. > > >http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=PublicationURL&_tockey=%23TO... > > > Research in Political Economy > > Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved > > > The Hidden History of 9-11-2001 > > Edited by: Paul Zarembka > > ISBN: 978-0-7623-1305-1 > > Paul Zarembka > > Part I: Hijackers - Who Were They? > > Pages 3-45 > > Jay Kolar > > > Inconsistencies and contradictions in the US government's story of > > hijackers and their masterminds are examined to account for what > > happened on 9-11. A little-known initial FBI list of 19, scrutinized > > for four names not on its final list, calls into question the FBI > > naming process. We discovered 11 of the FBI-named finalists could not > > have been on those planes, with 10 still alive and another's identity > > improvised by a double. The Dulles videotape, essentially the > > government's case that hijackers boarded the 9-11 flights, is found to > > have serious problems including authentication, as does the so-called > > bin Laden "confession" video. > > > Were "hijackers" known to be in the US before intelligence alleges it > > knew? Evidence is examined which shows that they were closely > > monitored by agencies which denied this knowledge; in particular, an > > undercover FBI agent lived with them the prior year. > > > Noting government refusal to disclose evidence called for by > > investigators, we find some pieces altered or fabricated and others > > confiscated or destroyed. Other revelations point to hijackers with > > national security overrides, protection in their alternate roles as > > drug traffickers, and deep political connections with government > > elites. We investigate patterns, reminiscent of historical > > intelligence involvement, revealing the presence of a covert > > intelligence operation disguised as an outside enemy attack. > > > Part II: The Morning of 9-11-2001 > > You are not entitled to access the full text of this document 4. > > Initiation of the 9-11 Operation, with Evidence of Insider Trading > > Beforehand > > Pages 49-77 > > Paul Zarembka > > Abstract | Full Text + Links | PDF (216 K) | To Purchase and Download > > the Full Article, Click PDF > > > This chapter first examines evidence concerning departures of the four > > flights out of Boston, D.C., and Newark, including identifications of > > the aircrafts involved, some evidence regarding the flight paths, and > > then the hijackings. Alleged video evidence at airports for the > > hijackers themselves is examined, but found to be unacceptable. > > > The fact of a conspiracy is uncontested by all. Three alternative > > conspiracy possibilities regarding the planes are examined: the > > 'official' one of suicide hijackers skillfully guiding planes with > > steeled determination into targets (independent of the hijackers' > > identities); use of beaconing or electronic control, similar to > > ordinary commercial landings, into the targets; and use of 'drone' > > airplanes. The third alternative is not supportable at this time, but > > the other two are possible explanations, not necessarily equally > > likely. > > > The issue of insider trading before 9-11 is addressed. Publicly > > available data from OptionMetrics are provided and analyzed, > > indicating that many early reports were not using accurate data. > > Turning to an academic study in the Journal of Business which relies > > upon confidential, superior data, the findings are summarized that, > > indeed, there is evidence of insider trading before 9-11 on American > > Airlines and United Airlines. Larger concerns of insider trading are > > also summarized. Lastly, we give brief consideration to the profits > > certain capitalists make out of 9-11. > > > You are not entitled to access the full text of this document 5. > > The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account > > Cannot Be True > > Pages 79-122 > > David Ray Griffin > > Abstract | Full Text + Links | PDF (326 K) | To Purchase and Download > > the Full Article, Click PDF > > > I argue that the official story about the collapses of the Twin Towers > > and building 7 of the World Trade Center, according to which the > > collapses were caused by fire - combined, in the case of the Twin > > Towers, with the effects of the airplane impacts - cannot be true, for > > two major reasons. One reason is that fire has never, except allegedly > > three times on 9/11, caused the total collapse of steel-frame high- > > rise buildings. All (other) such collapses have been produced by the > > use of explosives in the procedure known as "controlled demolition." > > The other major problem is that the collapses of all three buildings > > had at least 11 features that would be expected if, and only if, > > explosives had been used. > > > I also show the importance of the recently released of 9/11 Oral > > Histories recorded by the New York Fire Department. With regard to the > > Twin Towers, many of the firefighters and medical workers said they > > observed multiple explosions and other phenomena indicative of > > controlled demolition. With regard to building 7, many testimonies > > point to widespread foreknowledge that the building was going to > > collapse, and some of the testimonies contradict the official story > > that this anticipation of the building's collapse was based on > > objective indications. These testimonies further strengthen the > > already virtually conclusive case that all three buildings were > > brought down by explosives. > > > I conclude by calling on the New York Times, which got the 9/11 Oral > > Histories released, now to complete the task of revealing the truth > > about 9/11. > > > You are not entitled to access the full text of this document 6. > > The Military Drills on 9-11: "Bizarre Coincidence" or Something > > Else? > > Pages 123-145 > > Four Arrows (aka Don Jacobs) > > Abstract | Full Text + Links | PDF (172 K) | To Purchase and Download > > the Full Article, Click PDF > > > Short-term military simulations of scenarios or conditions that U.S. > > military personnel might meet are generally the largest, in terms of > > cost and personnel, of all operational training events. That at least > > six such exercises were scheduled for September 11, 2001 raises > > serious questions about whether or not the events of 9/11 were at > > least partially orchestrated by U.S. command. > > > In light of the aforementioned military exercises and the fact that > > the 9/11 Commission's Final Report barely mentions them, neither were > > they significantly discussed nor investigated during the hearings, > > this essay briefly explores four key questions that will hopefully > > stimulate further inquiries, investigations and perhaps subpoenas that > > will ultimately break the silence and force declassification of the > > information surrounding the war games. > > > 1. Has there been a high-level suppression of information about the > > military drills? > > > 2. Might the military drills have been a significant factor in the > > success of the attacks? > > > 3. Who was in charge of the military drills and what motives may have > > been operating for this person? > > > 4. In what way might Zacarias Moussaoui, the only person charged in > > the United States for the attacks, be a link that connects to the > > person in charge of the games to another tragedy that may have been > > "an inside job" - i.e. Senator Paul Wellstone's death, and how might > > Moussaoui connect all of this to the Pentagon? > > > Part III: The Context of 9-11-2001 and Meaning for the Future > > You are not entitled to access the full text of this document 7. > > Terrorism and Statecraft: Al-Qaeda and Western Covert Operations > > after the Cold War > > Pages 149-188 > > Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed > > Abstract | Full Text + Links | PDF (298 K) | To Purchase and Download > > the Full Article, Click PDF > > > Al-Qaeda is conventionally portrayed as a monolithic, hierarchical > > organization whose activities - coordinated by the network's leader > > Osama bin Laden - are the source of international terrorism today. Al- > > Qaeda is considered a radical tendency within the broader Islamist > > Salafi movement, legitimizing its terrorist operations as a global > > Islamist jihad against Western civilization. > > ... > > mais » -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
