On May 6, 6:26 am, "Martin P. Hellwig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dustan wrote: > > On May 6, 8:20 am, Steven D'Aprano > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sun, 06 May 2007 04:53:23 -0700, Dustan wrote: > >>> SPAM! > >>> SPAM! > >>> SPAM! > >>> SPAM! > >>> SPAM! > >>> SPAM! > >>> SPAM! > >>> SPAM! > >> Gosh, you think so? I'm glad we had you around to tell us, otherwise we > >> might have thought it was about Python programming. > > >> Actually, many of us wouldn't even have seen it in the first place, > >> because our ISPs do a good job of filtering out obvious spam before we > >> even see it. And then people like you come along, and reply to it, and we > >> see the reply -- complete with the original spam. > > > Well, sorry. I didn't realize I'd get whacked around for making a > > joke. > > >> -- > >> Steven. > > Aren't jokes supposed to be funny? > <Sorry can't resist/> > > -- > mph > > http://martinphellwig.blogspot.com/
What you can do: complain to Google adsense about the site's "advertising" complain to Google groups about the post it would be #complete unethical# for me to suggest that OP posted an apparently unrelated topic because he wanted the site's performance "ab" tested, like, y'know ab -n 100000 -kc 200 http://yourspamsitehere.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
