In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Roger Upole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Cameron Laird wrote:
>> QOTW: "That is just as feasible as passing a cruise ship through a phone
>> line." - Carsten Haese, on transporting a COM object across a network.
>> Less vividly but more formally, as he notes, "A COM object represents a
>> connection to a service or executable that is running on one computer.
>> Transferring that connection to another computer is impossible."
>>
>
>While this is indeed a nice turn of phrase, in substance it's incorrect.
>You can marshal a live COM object and unmarshal it on a different
>machine.
.
.
.
... but the *references* in that object are unlikely to be
meaningful on the second machine (or, in many cases, on the
original machine, if at a sufficiently later time).
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
