Diez B. Roggisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael >> > >> Does Python 2.4 support it? > > > > Not precisely, but you can *usually* get away with: > > > > a and b or c > > This is really bad advice, as long as you don't explain why it "usually" > works (and often enough not). This for example won't work: > > >>> False or '' and 0 > ''
You can use this if you want it to be bullet proof (a and [b] or [c])[0] Not exactly elegant though! -- Nick Craig-Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.craig-wood.com/nick -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
