Gabriel Genellina wrote: > En Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:07:27 -0300, Martin Drautzburg > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > >> Is it possible to convert an object into a string that identifies the >> object in a way, so it can later be looked up by this string. >> Technically this should be possible, because things like >> >> <__main__.Foo instance at 0xb7cfb6ac> >> >> say everything about an object. But how can I look up the real >> object, when I only have this string? >> >> I know such a thing can be achieved with a dictionary that holds >> reference-object pairs. Is there another way? > > Without further information, this would be the way. > What do you want to achieve? Maybe you are looking for the pickle > module. >
I was thinking that it would be nice if a web application could talk to real objects. The client side does not need to know the internals of an object, it acts as a "view" for server-side models. All it has to be able to do is invoke methods on "its" model. So a view could just store "its" object-reference in an instance variable and pass it to the server, where my problem of looking it up comes in. I am currently learning about web services but my feeling is that "state" is not an integral part of this concept, rather an add-on, but I may be mistaken here. But for any reasonable web application you have to introduce state one way or the other. My impression is, that this is achieved with "session objects", which hold all the state of a session (again I may be mistaken). But this would be a strange concept in an OO world. You might as well put "ALL" state into a global "state" state object, where all the class methods deposit their state and classes would hold behavior only and no state. This is of course nothing an OO programmer would want to do. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
