Jorgen Grahn a écrit : > On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 22:46:03 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >>Jorgen Grahn a écrit : > (snip) > >>More seriously, and as far as I'm concerned, when I want to make a >>python script (by opposition to a python 'module') available as a unix >>command, I either use a symlink or a shell script calling the python >>script. > > > A symlink yes, but a shell script? Wouldn't it be easier to write a > one-liner (well, two-liner) Python script in that case?
Not necessarily. Just like there are cases where it makes sens to use Perl instead of Python, some things are really far simpler to do with shell scripts... -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
