orangeDinosaur wrote: > OK, I'll go with the enthought installation. This seems to be the > path of least resistance. For those of you who have been in my > position, is there a reason NOT to go with the enthought installation > and do things piecemeal instead? > > thanks, > trevis > > On Apr 20, 11:36 am, Pete Forman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> orangeDinosaur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > [...] But now, the figure window is completely unresponsive -- I >> > can't even close it without getting the "your program is not >> > repsonding" business. What am I missing? This behavior so far >> > seems pretty unintuitive. >> >> The best way out of this is to use IPython. It also needs a backend >> which remains responsive, WxAgg works but Tk did not last time I >> tried. IPython 0.8.1 is a release candidate which fixes some Windows >> issues in 0.8.0. If you want a stable package that has all the parts >> present out of the box then look at Enthought. >> -- >> Pete Forman -./\.- Disclaimer: This post is originated >> WesternGeco -./\.- by myself and does not represent >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -./\.- the opinion of Schlumberger >> orhttp://petef.port5.com -./\.- WesternGeco. > > It's rather heavy and may include stuff you don't need.
I'm not sure that scipy has been updated to Python 2.5 Colin W. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
