Stephen Kellett wrote: > Lots of points from Tony stating a different point of view. I'll assume you > are correct. However, > surely if you Python 2.4 installed they'll have this DLL anyway, so the point > is moot, unless of > course, Python 2.4 is in breach as well.
the compilers used to build Python 2.4 were provided by Microsoft, free of charge. conspiracy theorists may see this as evidence of some evil plan, of course, but I can assure you that when it comes to evilness, the PSU b -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
