Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What do you think the chances are of this being accepted for Python 3.0? > It is indeed about the most rational approach, though of course it does > cause problems with dynamic namespaces.
What problems do you have in mind? The compiler already determines the set of names that are local variables for a function; all it needs to do is diagnose an error or warning if the set of names for a nested function overlaps with that of an outer one. I shamefully admit that I haven't followed Python 3.0 discussions much lately, so I don't really know what's planned on this issue. Alex -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
