On Apr 3, 12:53 pm, Kevin Walzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm confused by the number of variations on "popen" that Python offers. > > I'm using os.popen in my programs without difficulty. Is this wrong? > Should I be using popen 2, popen3, etc.? I'm not clear on what the > advantages of popen2, 3 etc. are: they seem a lot more complicated. > > -- > Kevin Walzer > Code by Kevinhttp://www.codebykevin.com
Check out subprocess. It's meant to be a replacement for all of the above. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
