>Actually, this is one of the cases I was talking about. I find it >saner to convert to non-blocking I/O and use select() for >synchronization. That solves the problem, without introducing any of >the headaches related to shared access and locking that come with >threads.
Threads aren't always the right entity for dealing with asynchronicity, one might say. C// -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
