On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 03:59:52 -0700, dartsch wrote:
> I get an output like > > <function g at 0x00AFC1F0> > <function g at 0x00AFC1F0> > > So according to print I get the same function object returned at both > calls. Not the same function object. The first object is printed, then deleted by the garbage collector because it goes out of scope. Then the second one is created and just happens to end up in the same memory location. That's an accident of the garbage collector implementation. > That's surprising, I would expect to get two distinct function objects > because their func_closure attribute has to be different. And indeed, > if I do [snip] > <function g at 0x00AFC1B0> > <function g at 0x00AFC1F0> > > ie. two distinct function objects are printed. This time the first function still exists when the second is created, so the second naturally can't be in the same memory location. -- Steven. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
