[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John J. Lee) writes: > You've explained that *linking* to a non-permanent URL would break the > rules. You haven't explained why *pasting in* the text of the post > would break the rules (I don't say it wouldn't break them, I'm just > curious).
I've looked into this situation and I advise just not worrying about it for now. The link is likely to be restored pretty soon if it hasn't been already. If not, wait a day or two and then put it back. It was removed along with a zillion other Usenet links because someone got overzealous about spam reversion and turned an automatic script loose that removed all such links indiscriminately, including a lot that there wasn't anything wrong with. There was a discussion on the wiki about it, the person stopped the script, and is now (slowly) undoing the script's removals. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
