>foo bar baz >foo(bar,baz) 1st still is shorter by 1 char; considering majority of people use space after comma & number of parameters can be big it yileds foo bar baz bar2 bar3 bar4 vs foo(bar, baz, bar2, bar3, bar4)
> result = func1 for this case should using result = func1() should remain + remaining function defenitions def myfun(param1, param2,...,paramk, *args, **kwargs) > How would you write "a = b(c())"? a = b c() >So what should "a b c d" be? >(a, b, c, d) >a(b, c, d) >a(b, (c, d)) >a(b(c, d)) >a(b(c(d))) I mentioned above that it should be 2nd case >I don't know how caml resolves these ambiguities, or even if caml resolves them Yes, he does it perfectly, hence Python could have same abilities. But I don't insist anything, I only proposed. Since majority disagreed with the proposition, it don't worth further discussion. WBR, D. P.S. Steven, many people aren't able speak English as good as you, so do I. I hope majority of readers will forgive me for wasting their costly attantion & time. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
