En Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:35:00 -0300, Gerry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> which seems to work. Here's the mysterious part (aside from why > anything was unicode in the first place): > > print >> debug, "c=", col, "r=", row, "v=", value, > "qno=", qno > tuple = (qno, family) > try: > data[tuple].append(value) > except: > data[tuple] = [value] > print >> debug, "!!!", col, row, qno, family, tuple, > value, data[tuple] > > which produces: > > c= 1 r= 3 v= 4 qno= Q1 > !!! 1 3 Q1 O (u'Q1', 'O') 4 [1, u' ', 4] > > where qno seems to be a vanilla Q1, but a tuple using qno is > (u'Q1', ...). I bet qno was unicode from start. When you print an unicode object, you get the "unadorned" contents. When you print a tuple, it uses repr() on each item. py> qno = u"Q1" py> qno u'Q1' py> print qno Q1 py> print (qno,2) (u'Q1', 2) -- Gabriel Genellina -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
