On 3/11/07, Jarek Zgoda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bjoern Schliessmann napisał(a): > > >> I'd recommend pyGTK. It's easy to use, delivers astonishing > >> results and is perfectly portable as far as I know. > > > > And how does it look on Windows? :) > > On styled Windows XP it looks like any other styled application > (counting those Qt and wx based).
This is really an overstatement. While it uses the Windows theme manager to draw widgets, and will appear native in screenshots, nobody is going to mistake a Gtk app for a native Windows one in use. There are lots of behaviors and graphical differences from native applications. That said, in order to make a useful recommendation your requirements need to be better known. Browser based clients are often poor for high speed data entry, especially with highly trained data entry people. You simply don't have enough control over the browser environment, and you're limited in your ability to offload processing to the client. Ironing out browser differences is also no picnic. On the other hand you've got rapid and low cost deployment and updates. Licensing is the main reason I'd avoid pyQt, if the licensing fits your needs (or budget) then it's a perfectly reasonable solution. Gtk I consider an extremely poor contender as a cross platform toolkit. The runtime is enormous and it makes little effort to appear native on any non-GNOME platform. wxPython is also a perfectly reasonable solution, especially if you want a "native" seeming app on all platforms. If consistency of interface, rather than a native interface, is more important to you then Qt would probably be a better choice. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
