On Mar 11, 5:15 pm, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's a bug that keeps resurfacing, probably because there's no portable > way to test that it stays fixed :-( (it's not an accident that the OP > relied on atan2 to distinguish +0.0 from -0.0! they act the same in > /almost/ all contexts).
Not an accident, but not a contrived example either. I'd rewritten all the cmath routines (in pure Python) to be more numerically aware and use the `correct' (= those recommended by Kahan) branch cuts. It was in writing the unit tests for this that the problems above surfaced. By the way, I don't suppose that anybody would be interested in a rewritten cmath for Python 2.6? It wouldn't be hard for me to rewrite what I already have in C, and add suitable documentation and tests. Mark -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list