En Sun, 11 Mar 2007 11:35:58 -0300, Janto Dreijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>> At least, the problem of using the same generator from different threads >> still remains, if you don't use my modified code. In general, when using >> multiple threads you always need some way to syncronize access to shared >> objects. You are lucky with Sessions because append is an atomic >> operation >> on lists; for more information see >> http://effbot.org/pyfaq/what-kinds-of-global-value-mutation-are-threa... > > Again you're right. But even putting a try-except:return around the > random.choice still manages to break the interpreter. I'm not looking > for any meaningful output really. I just want it not to break. A try/except won't help a concurrency problem, unfortunately. > Like I said, this is just watered down code to try and isolate the > problem. So I suggest to start with some small, *correct*, code, and then add more features until you reconstruct your big program in a safe way. -- Gabriel Genellina -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
