> Alan: >> I really think you should reread the PEP, which is making >> the opposite of your point.
Skip: > Quite the opposite, in fact. Laura Creighton wrote that > PEP precisely with the expectation (and hope) that Guido > would reject it, which he did: Note the title and status. Sorry Skip, but this is really just a matter of taking off your blinkers and learning to read. As you say, note the title and status. Or alternatively, read this from the PEP: I figure if I make this PEP, we can then ask Guido to quickly reject it, and then when this argument next starts up again, we can say 'Guido isn't changing things to suit the tab-haters or the only-tabbers, so this conversation is a waste of time.' Alan Isaac -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list