Bjoern Schliessmann wrote: > tubby wrote: >> Right now I'm just prototyping and the threaded hosts portion >> works very well for my needs. I'd just like to add a threaded >> ports check and wanted to know if anyone had done something >> similar in Python. > > Taken the vast amount of threads you'll need, there will be a big > overhead. Using a different means of concurrency is advisable. > > BTW, why not use nmap?
Have you tried it? Nmap is sequential. It takes about 5 hours to do web server checks (port 80 only) on a class B network... I think it does ports in parallel, but not hosts. Even when you use the insane time setting the wait is untimely. I can do the same thing in roughly 15 minutes with Python or Ruby using threads. Granted, Nmap is much more configurable and flexible, but it simply does not scale to address large networks...nessus is the same way. Also remember that we're dealing with IPv4 networks now. How will we deal with larger IPv6 address spaces. Besides clustering and distributed processing (mapreduce), it seems that threads may help deal with some of the scaling issues I face right now. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
