On Feb 23, 10:34 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 23, 10:39 am, Martin Manns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:52:06 -0600 > > > Larry Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I quick search of Google turned up: > > > >http://books.google.com/books?id=1Shx_VXS6ioC&pg=PA625&lpg=PA625&dq=p... > > >http://calcrpnpy.sourceforge.net/clnum.html > > >http://gmpy.sourceforge.net/ > > > Sorry that I did not point these out initially. > > > + clnum seems to be slower and for speed may be compiled to wrap gmp so > > that it is just an additional layer between python and gmp . > > > + gmpy is looking pretty unmaintained (dead) to me (newest update of > > cvs 10 months ago).
I worked with Alex Martelli (gmpy's maintainer) to fix a bug found by mensanator. With Alex's permission, I released it as gmpy 1.04a. Alex has not updated cvs with the fix. gmpy 1.04a compiles cleanly with the latest releases of Python and GMP, so I consider it stable. > > Actually, gmpy is being maitained even if SourceForge isn't up to > date. > > I got my gmpy 1.04a for Python 2.5 Windows binary from > > <http://home.comcast.net/~casevh> > > I haven't used the rationals all that much, but been very > happy with them when I have. > casevh -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
