Boris Ozegovic wrote: > Diez B. Roggisch wrote: > >> Are you sure the above is what you really used for your test? Because >> your output features a single 100, which the above lacks a >> print-statement for. > > Yeah, I cancelled the message, but synchronization allready happened. :) > > Problem was in some other place. > > One more question: is calling import inside function definition poor > design? e.g. > > def foo(): > doSomething: > import someModule > someModule.doSomethin
I use it sometimes myself, to avoid otherwise circular imports. However, I don't like it very much. Try to go without it I'd say, but that is just a gut-feeling. Diez -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list