>> That's the proof. Can you find a flaw in it? > No, but it doesn't matter. There's no particular reason why you have to > write "print (whatever)" in your code. What you need is *some function* > that is capable of duplicating the functionality of print,
Precisely wrong. The title of this thread is 'the end of print', and the whole point of my comments is that spelling matters. I would have absolutely no objection to the pep if it specified some other name for an 'official' print function. Pick any name, preferably longer than two characters, that does not conflict with either an existing global function or module. Edward -------------------------------------------------------------------- Edward K. Ream email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Leo: http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/front.html -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
