On Feb 14, 4:37 pm, Paul Rubin <http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Java has historically had no support at all for real multiple process > > solutions (akin to fork() or ZwCreateProcess() with NULL > > SectionHandle), which should make up the vast majority of parallel > > programs (basically all of those except where you don't want memory > > protection). > > I don't know what ZwCreateProcess is (sounds like a Windows-ism)
Yeah, it's the Window equivalent to fork. Does true copy-on-write, so you can do efficient multiprocess work. > but I > remember using popen() under Java 1.1 in Solaris. That at least > allows launching a new process and communicating with it. Yep. That's okay for limited kinds of applications. > I don't know if there was anything like mmap. That would be important as well. > I think this is mostly a > question of library functions--you could certainly write JNI > extensions for that stuff. Sure. If you're writing extensions you can work around the GIL, too. > > Has this changed in recent Java releases? Is there a way to use > > efficient copy-on-write multiprocess architectures? > > I do think they've been adding more stuff for parallelism in general. Up through 1.3/1.4 or so they were pretty staunchly in the "threads for everything!" camp, but they've added a select/poll-style call a couple versions back. That was a pretty big sticking point previously. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list