[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> That's a little harsh -- regexes have their place, together with pointer >> arithmetic, bit manipulations, reverse polish notation and goto. The >> problem is when people use them inappropriately e.g. using a regex when a >> simple string.find will do. >> >>> A quote attributed variously to >>> Tim Peters and Jamie Zawinski says "Some people, when confronted with a >>> problem, think 'I know, I'll use regular expressions.' Now they have two >>> problems." >> I believe that is correctly attributed to Jamie Zawinski. >> >> -- >> Steven > > So as a newbie, I have to ask. I've played with the re module now for > a while, I think regular expressions are super fun and useful. As far > as them being a problem I found they can be tricky and sometimes the > regex's I've devised do unexpected things...(which I can think of two > instances where that unexpected thing was something that I had hoped > to get into further down the line, yay for me!). So I guess I don't > really understand why they are a "bad idea" to use. I don't know of > any other way yet to parse specific data out of a text, html, or xml > file without resorting to regular expressions. > What other ways are there? > Re's aren't inherently bad. Just avoid using them as a hammer to the extent that all your problems look like nails.
They wouldn't exist if there weren't problems it was appropriate to use them on. Just try to use simpler techniques first. For example, don't use re's to find out if a string starts with a specific substring when you could instead use the .startswith() string method. regards Steve -- Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com Skype: holdenweb http://del.icio.us/steve.holden Blog of Note: http://holdenweb.blogspot.com See you at PyCon? http://us.pycon.org/TX2007 -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
