On 6 Feb 2007 12:51:13 -0800, BBands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >No, no, no, this is not an invitation to the editor wars. > >I have been using José Cláudio Faria's superb Tinn-R, >http://www.sciviews.org/Tinn-R/, >with the R language, http://www.r-project.org/. This editor allows you >to send code to the R shell for execution. You can easily send a line, >the selection, the balance after the cursor or the whole script. > >I have recently decided to move this project to Python instead of R. >However, I miss the interaction with the shell a la Tinn-R. Do any of >the Python editors support this feature? I would be especially >interested in using IPython as the shell.
Python mode for emacs defines these functions which may be interesting to you: python-send-buffer Command: Send the current buffer to the inferior Python process. python-send-command Function: Like `python-send-string' but resets `compilation-minor-mode'. python-send-defun Command: Send the current defun (class or method) to the inferior Python process. python-send-receive Function: Send STRING to inferior Python (if any) and return result. python-send-region Command: Send the region to the inferior Python process. python-send-region-and-go Command: Send the region to the inferior Python process. python-send-string Command: Evaluate STRING in inferior Python process. Jean-Paul -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
