Courageous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >It should also be pointed out that the FSF's interpretation of the GPL > >with respect to Qt means absolutely zero. > > Indeed. It would be the court that would have to decide what the > language of the GPL means, given the substantial body of case > law as the court sees it. > > > >... but it establishes that you *knew* what their interpretation ... > > But it doesn't. They'd really need to put it into their license > expressly.
Indeed. The GPL itself says: "The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow. ... END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS" It's what is between those sentences which counts when to comes to governing the use of the covered software. There is no mention of "And also see the FAQs on the GPL on the FSF Web site to understand what we really mean by the GPL." Tim C -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
