I dont see anything wrong ! Did you try to measure time with your watch ? Did you try a simple python test.py without the time command ? Maybe python is 'disturbed' by the intel core
Here my result on a linux dual AMD, python 2.4.3 # time python test.py n=35, v=14930352 utime=22.54, stime=0.02 real 0m22.755s user 0m22.564s sys 0m0.022s can you try this ? # strace python test.py 2>&1 | grep time times({tms_utime=1, tms_stime=1, tms_cutime=0, tms_cstime=0}) = 430217777 times({tms_utime=2238, tms_stime=2, tms_cutime=0, tms_cstime=0}) = 430220049 write(1, "n=35, v=14930352\nutime=22.37, st"..., 41n=35, v=14930352 utime=22.37, stime=0.01 now you can compare what your system replied and what python returned ! On 2 fév, 19:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question about os.times(). > os.times() returns a tuple containing user time and system time, > but it is not matched to the result of 'time' command. > For example, os.times() reports that user time is 39.85 sec, > but 'time' command reports that user time is 28.55sec. > (machine: Python2.5, MacOS X 10.4 Tiger, MacBook 1.83GHz intel core > duo) > > file: ostimetest.py > -------------------- > import os > > ## benchmark function > def f(x): > if x <= 1: > return 1 > else: > return f(x-1) + f(x-2) > > ## do benchmark > n = 35 > t1 = os.times() # start time > v = f(n) # end time > print "n=%d, v=%d" % (n, v) > t2 = os.times() > > ## print result > utime = t2[0] - t1[0] # user time > stime = t2[1] - t1[1] # system time > print "utime=%s, stime=%s" % (utime, stime) > -------------------- > > Result: > ==================== > $ python -V > Python 2.5 > $ time python ostimetest.py > n=35, v=14930352 > utime=39.85, stime=0.216666666667 > real 0m28.554suser 0m23.938ssys 0m0.177s > ==================== > > This shows that os.times() reports that user time is 39.85sec, > but time command shows that user time is 23.938sec. > Why os.times() reports wrong result? Do I have any mistake? > > -- > kwatch -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list