Daniel Nogradi wrote: > Since I'm starting to use sqlobject right now, if there is a > similar ORM tool that is comparable but up to date and actively > developed, that would be an option too. (Things like SQLAlchemy are > waaaay to complicated and complex for my needs. :))
Perhaps not really an answer to your question, but is SQLAlchemy really so much more complicated than SQLObject? I've been using SQLObject a lot the past few years, but have recently migrated some of my code to SQLAlchemy for various reasons: it's much better documented, has more features, performs better and at least seems to be more actively developed. My conclusion was that I had to make very little changes to make my SQLObject code work with SQLAlchemy. Defining your classes/tables is more verbose, but still straightforward. And by using the proper defaults and things like assign_mapper, actual use of SQLAlchemy comes very close to SQLObject. Regards, Jan -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
