>If dynamic, then, it doesn't make sense that an EXE that builds on Qt >should also be GPLed.
I'm hoping you're referring to the owners choice of license. For example, if someone, owning rights to a thing that was a dynamic library, decided to have a license akin to the GPL, it would easily qualify. It's a question of /distribution/. If you copy parts of the work, and redestribute those copies, you are caught by the rule of law. After that the license is a matter of reduction to practice. C// -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
