Luke Skywalker wrote:
> Considering the fact that the Qt DLL exist by themselves, that the
> version used is the one provided by Qt, and that the EXE uses a
> standard, open way to communicate with it, the above does seem to say
> this use would be valid.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#MereAggregation
"/.../ If modules are designed to run linked together in a shared address
space, that almost surely means combining them into one program.
By contrast, pipes, sockets and command-line arguments are
communication mechanisms normally used between two separate
programs. So when they are used for communication, the modules
normally are separate programs. But if the semantics of the
communication are intimate enough, exchanging complex internal
data structures, that too could be a basis to consider the two parts
as combined into a larger program."
</F>
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
