On 2006-12-13, Roberto Bonvallet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > at wrote: >> More pythonic in view would be: >> >> for x in [-2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4] if x > 0: >> ... more code ... > > Pythonic? Do you realize that Python hasn't even adopted > well-known statements like 'switch' and 'do while' because they > would be redundant? > > This could be more convenient to you, but certainly not > pythonic. Cheers,
I tried it once myself. It seemed like a feasible thing that might work in Python. It didn't annoy me that it didn't work, but it did seem natural to me given the syntax of comprehensions. -- Neil Cerutti -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
