"vincent wehren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Leif K-Brooks wrote: >> Is there a word for an iterable object which isn't also an iterator, and >> therefor can be iterated over multiple times without being exhausted?
The 'therefor' above is a non sequitor. A non-iterator iterable can also be non-reiterable. > How about 'reiterable'? I agree. Reiterability is essential for some algorithms, while I am hard put to think of a situation in which non-iterator-ness, by itself, is. Terry J. Reedy -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
