> make the import statements look good. You can still make your import statements look good and have one class per file, that's one of the __init__.py wonderful features. Also, C++ support stand alone functions and the rule is to organize classes and their interface (functions that operate in objects of the class are considered part of the interface) in their own module. I will like to understand why this will not be a good idea for python, other than to make beautiful import statements that is. Thanks, - Isaac. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
- Re: One module per class, bad ... Gabriel Genellina
- Re: One module per class, bad ... Carl Banks
- Re: One module per class, bad ... Carl Banks
- Re: One module per class, bad ... Gabriel Genellina
- Re: One module per class, bad ... Carl Banks
- Refactoring between files (was... Ben Finney
- Re: One module per class, bad idea? Kent Johnson
- Re: One module per class, bad idea... Carl Banks
- Re: One module per class, bad idea? Gabriel Genellina
- Re: One module per class, bad idea? billie
- Re: One module per class, bad idea? Isaac Rodriguez
- Re: One module per class, bad idea? Carl Banks
- Re: One module per class, bad idea? mystilleef
- Re: One module per class, bad idea? Jorgen Grahn
- Re: One module per class, bad idea? stdazi