greg ha escrito: > From another angle, think about what a hypothetical > Python-to-Lisp translator would have to do. It couldn't > just translate "a + b" into "(+ a b)". It would have > to be something like "(*python-add* a b)" where > *python-add* is some support function doing all the > dynamic dispatching that the Python interpreter would > have done. > > That's what I mean by Python being more dynamic than > Lisp.
I see no dinamism on your example, just static overloading. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
