Paul Rubin wrote: > "Kaz Kylheku" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Lisp just seems hopelessly old-fashioned to me these days. A > > > modernized version would be cool, but I think the more serious > > > Lisp-like language designers have moved on to newer ideas. > > > > What are some of their names, and what ideas are they working on? > > http://caml.inria.fr > http://www.haskell.org
Right. What these have in common with Lisp is that they use manifest typing, whereas Lisp uses latent typing. But after that, they mostly diverge. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
