Mark Tarver wrote: > seems to show that Python is a cut down (no macros) version of Lisp > with a worse performance.
If you wont to put it this way, go for it. But if you care to give it a closer look, you may understand that Pythons main advantage is not seizable by feature and performance charts. Regards, -- Soni Bergraj http://www.YouJoy.org/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
