John Machin wrote: > No it doesn't look wrong to anyone who has read the docs on > sys.modules.
My point was really that there is no obvious implementation for 'in' on dictionaries, so it should have been left out. And that GvR thought so for quite some time as well (until he got mixed up with a crowd of ex C++ programmers). Daniel -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
