alf wrote: > Hi, > is there a more elegant way to get o.__class__.__name__. For instance I > would imagine name(o).
def name_of_type(o):
return o.__class__.__name__
name_of_type(o)
Carl Banks
P.S. name(o) suggests it's the name of the object, not the type
P.P.S. you could use type(o).__name__ but it doesn't work for old-style
classes
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
