Shane Hathaway wrote: > > IMHO your licensing terms are fine; you don't need to switch from the CC > license. Just avoid the term "free as in freedom", since the Free > Software Foundation has assigned that phrase a very specific meaning.
Agreed. It should also be noted that Debian - amongst the strictest with regard to software and content licensing - do not regard the CC licences as being "free as in freedom": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons_licenses http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html http://people.debian.org/~evan/draftresponse.txt Consequently, it may be appropriate to remind authors to also make their works more widely available under a licence that may permit further distribution, if that is desirable. Paul P.S. I still don't really understand why the FSF unreservedly recommends the Free Art licence when it has a "choice of law" clause that has prevented things like the GPL-compatibility of other licences in the past. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
