>It is ugly, unreadable and error prone. If I have to use this code, I >would write > _z = func(_x + _y + _whatever['as'] + _a[0]) >and use a perl script to generate the real code. (See, I am not lazy :-) Ok laziness is an acceptable answer ;) This is starting to make sense , you've been reading Perl's 'dense' code and are not used to Python's explicitness. *Explicit is better than implicit!* It is a Zen of Python. Also I notice you say you will probably use the 'evil hack'. Uhmmm, it is labeled evil hack for a reason! So go ahead and make life hard and save a few keystrokes. There is a reason for the verbosity of Python. I really don't completly follow what you are trying to construct here but it seems like you need to create an adapter class of some sort and use that ( much like Jeff Shannon or Michael Spencer mentioned ) As a general rule class abstraction is your friend in Python. It looks like ultimatly you are just using dictionary's and want to do inplace operations on some of the data and store the results in other parts of the dictionary... If that is the case then why not creat a few helper functions that do exactly one thing each and use them as your interface.
Py> def fun_helper(d): ... d['z'] = func(d['x']+d['y']+d['whatever']['as']+d[a][0]) ... return d and use them as needed. M.E.Farmer -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
