[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Ok, I built Python 2.5 (same AIX 5.1 machine). With the "for line in
> shellOut" loop in, it now takes "only" 7 secs instead of the 11 secs in
> python 2.4.3. So, that's better, but still unreasonably slow. And to
> answer another's question, I'm using the ksh builtin 'time' command to
> time the overall script.
>
> BTW, I don't think the AIX /bin/sh (actually ksh) is inherently slow.
> This naively translated pure shell version of my python test script
> completes in .1 secs:
>
> i=1
> while ((i<20))
> do ((i+=1))
> print next
> print "$shellIn" | /bin/sh -c ':' |
> while read line
> do print $line
> done
> done
>
> Has anyone tried this on a true unix box (AIX, HPUX, Solaris, Linux)?
> It seems to be functioning differently (and faster) on Windows and OS X
> (though I guess at its heard, OS X is essentially unix).
>
> John.
>
Linux 2.6.17-1.2142_FC4smp #1 SMP Tue Jul 11 22:57:02 EDT 2006 i686 i686
i386 GNU/Linux
# <code>
import os
import timeit
def test():
for i in xrange(20):
(shellIn, shellOut) = os.popen4("/bin/sh -c ':'")
print 'next'
for line in shellOut:
print line
print timeit.Timer("test()", "from __main__ import test\nimport
os").timeit(1)
# </code>
This returns in 0.4 seconds. If I time it to do 50 tests, it returns
after 20.2 - 20.5 seconds. Even if I substitute the for i in xrange()
construct to your sh-like while statement. And all that through a
network, with print statements intact. Guess your true Unix box has some
features unavailable on Fedora Core or MacOS X ;-)
Regards,
Łukasz Langa
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
