On 22 Oct 2006 02:40:17 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With some cleaning and improving, I think wax > (http://zephyrfalcon.org/labs/wax.html ) can become good too. I looked at Wax, but the author doesn't seem to be too involved with it. It looks like a cool idea that he developed far enough to make it work, and then got bored with it. I mean hell, there isn't even a workable grid class that does anything differently than the wxPython grid does! Dabo's implementation is already llight years ahead of Wax, despite entering the game much later. When you've worked with lots of open source projects, you can tell which are actively being developed and which are dead or comatose; you can tell which have a growing community and which are stagnant; you can tell which are worth investing your time into learning and/or contributing to, and which are dead-ends. Wax feels like a real dead-end to me. -- # p.d. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
