Jordan Greenberg wrote: ... > >>> def printreverse(lst): > if lst: > printreverse(lst[1:]) > print lst[:1][0]
Convoluted way of writing "print lst[0]" ! > >>> printreverse([1,2,3,4]) > > No good reason at all to do it this way. But recursion is fun. But there's a good reason not to. Try: printreverse(range(1000)) Recursion has a maximum depth (of 1000 by default) in Python. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
