Carsten Haese wrote: > You seem to have difficulty distinguishing the concept of looping over a > tuple from the concept of unpacking a tuple.
I think you're right. It's starting to make more sense now. I think when I saw: for x,y in t I was expecting 't' to be a two-tuple for it to work. Maybe writing it as: for (x,y) in t sort of helps to show that '(x,y)' is equivalent to one object in 't'. That makes it look a little more cohesive in my mind, I guess, or helps me to see it map out against 't' better. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
